<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
  <!-- RSS generated by glacieravalanche.org on {ts '2012-02-22 23:27:55'} -->
 
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

    <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://www.glacieravalanche.org/rss2.cfm" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
       <title>Glacier Country Avalanche Center</title>
       <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org</link>
       <description>Glacier Country Avalanche Center (GCAC) is a partnership between the US Forest Service, National Park Service, National Weather Service, Glacier Country Avalanche Center Incorporated (GCAC Inc), and the people and businesses of Northwest Montana with the goal of educating the public about avalanche danger in Northwest Montana.</description>
       <language>en-us</language>
      
       <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:27:55 EST</lastBuildDate>
       

   <item>
         <title>Feb 21 2012 NW Montana Avalanche Advisory</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	<img alt="" src="/adv_uploads/icons/pdficon_small.gif" style="width: 17px; height: 17px" />&nbsp;<a href="http://www.glacieravalanche.org/advisory/currentadvisory.pdf">Current NW Montana Glacier Country Avalanche Advisory</a></p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/currentadvisory.cfm?recnum=427</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/currentadvisory.cfm?recnum=427</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-02-21 hh:02:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>JFS Canyon, Glacier National Park</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/TM-ECTQrBAA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=509</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=509</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-02-21 hh:02:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Test Slope 1</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/kUoWI6XECpo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=510</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=510</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-02-21 hh:02:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Lost Johnny Creek Snowmobile Fatality</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	On Monday, 2-20-12, a Washington state snowmobiler was caught, buried, and killed in a relatively small avalanche in the Lost Johnny Creek drainage of the northern Swan Range above Hungry Horse Reservoir.&amp;nbsp; Very late in the day the party of two snowmobilers was side hilling across a lower angle slope just above the road.&amp;nbsp; As they cut the slope they collapsed a buried surface hoar layer, releasing snow on the steeper slope above.&amp;nbsp; Both riders were caught in the slide.&amp;nbsp; One was able to dig himself free but was unable to find him companion who was totally buried.&amp;nbsp; The buried victim wore a transceiver, but the survivor did not.&amp;nbsp; After a period of searching the survivor returned to the trailhead at Hungry Horse Dam and alerted 911.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	A search and rescue party made of North Valley Search and Rescue, Flathead County Sheriff&amp;rsquo;s Office, and US Forest Service personnel used transceivers to quickly pinpoint the victim&amp;rsquo;s location when they arrived.&amp;nbsp; When dug free, the initial indications were that the victim had quickly died from trauma as the result of violent tumbling with the snow machine and its encounter with several modest sized trees.&amp;nbsp; The victim&amp;rsquo;s helmet and backpack were both torn off.&amp;nbsp; The victim&amp;rsquo;s snow machine was dug free and retrieved the following day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	An investigation is underway and a more detailed report will be filled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Stan Bones, Flathead National Forest&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/incidentsdetail.cfm?recnum=67</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/incidentsdetail.cfm?recnum=67</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-02-20 hh:02:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Marion Lake</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Lots of avalanche activity and signs of instabilitiy today (2/20/2012)!!!</p>
<p>
	Experienced widespread cracking and collapsing above 6000 ft. &nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Pit dug on NE aspect above Marion Lake. &nbsp;This pit dug adjacent to collapse and subsequent fracture of weak layer without an avalanche. &nbsp;Widespread cracking and collapsing on all aspects. &nbsp;Remotely triggered soft slab avalanche on ESE aspect from about 30-40m away on the flats on the ridge. &nbsp;Failure layer on all avalanche activity was surface hoar layer about 50-60cm from surface. &nbsp;On ESE aspects this layer sits on top of a MF crust.&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	<img alt="" src="/adv_uploads/SfcHoarWithOutline.jpg" style="width: 450px; height: 537px; " /></p>
<p>
	Image 1: Surface hoar crystals buried about 50-60cm from the surface. &nbsp;Notice striations on these feathery crystals.</p>
<p>
	<img alt="" src="/adv_uploads/SlabOnSfcHoarHardness2.jpg" style="width: 450px; height: 798px; " /></p>
<p>
	Image 2: Generalized image of snowpack in this area. All avalanches sliding on surface hoar layer.</p>
<p>
	<img alt="" src="/adv_uploads/EssexCkRemoteTrigger3.jpg" style="width: 450px; height: 254px; " /></p>
<p>
	Image 3: Remotely triggered soft slab on aspects that wrap around from NE to SE.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=506</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=506</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-02-20 hh:02:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Lost Johnny Avalanche Fatality</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	An avalanche fatality occurred in Lost Johnny basin Monday afternoon, Feb. 20. A report will be posted on this website as soon as it is complete. Below is a link to an article in the Daily Interlake regarding the incident.</p>
<p>
	<a href="http://www.dailyinterlake.com/news/local_montana/article_9a90b8d6-5cb0-11e1-95ec-001871e3ce6c.html">http://www.dailyinterlake.com/news/local_montana/article_9a90b8d6-5cb0-11e1-95ec-001871e3ce6c.html</a><span style="display: none">&nbsp;</span></p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=507</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=507</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-02-20 hh:02:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Marion Dickey Ridge</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Toured up the Marion trail to the Marion Dickey ridge with the GMS&#39;ers. South facing&nbsp;ski and skin tracks from the day before were just about completely covered. Was able to feel the buried sun crust only on the covex roll overs on the slopes above the lake, otherwise it was not noticable at all. North facing down to Dickey creek was in excellent shape. However, there were some minor slab releases on steep roll overs between 5,000&#39; and 5,500&#39;, 12&quot; crowns (recent storm snow), did not run far. Still a lot of alder showing at this elevation and below, but negotiable down to the Dickey road. Moderate trail breaking with up to boot top penetration. Only one other party in the basin that day. Snowing heavily at the end of the day with moderate wind gusts coming down the lake.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=505</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=505</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-02-19 hh:02:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Skiumah Ck.</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Upper elevations really need to let the lower elevations know that ,yup, it&#39;s winter! &nbsp;Skinning was easy down low (except for the brush), and moderately difficult above 6000 feet. &nbsp;Ski penetration was about 20-25 cm up high.</p>
<p>
	Buried surfaced hoar is still evident on many slopes. &nbsp;We found this weak layer about 25 cm down from the surface in our snowpits. &nbsp;On a north aspect, this layer is now sandwiched between new snow and older harder snow. &nbsp;On east aspects, we also found some evidence of this layer sitting atop a melt-freeze crust. &nbsp;Our Extended Column Test on a N aspect gave us no results (i.e no propagation). &nbsp;Our Compression Test yielded CT14 Q2. &nbsp;</p>
<p>
	We experienced isolated cracking on E and SE aspects off the ridge. These cracks weren&#39;t traveling very far, though. &nbsp;Wind slabs were present, but not quite slabby enough to move. &nbsp;However, the surface snow was easily sluffing and moving fast and readily. &nbsp;A bit more wind and snow and....</p>
<p>
	We did get a couple of very small pockets of wind slab to move further down where wind in the gully is variable and the surface snow was a bit more slabby.&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	<a class="highslide" href="/adv_uploads/2012_0218CascadeCreek.jpg" onclick="return hs.expand(this)"> <img alt="Highslide JS" src="/adv_uploads/2012_0218CascadeCreek.jpg" title="Click to enlarge image" width="300" /></a></p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=504</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=504</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-02-18 hh:02:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Twin-Wildcat Lakes Avalanche Incident Report</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href=&quot;/adv_uploads/Twin_Wildcat_IncidentReport.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;/adv_uploads/IncidentReport_twin_wildcat.jpg&quot; style=&quot;border-bottom: 0px solid; border-left: 0px solid; width: 300px; height: 186px; border-top: 0px solid; border-right: 0px solid&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;img alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;/adv_uploads/icons/pdficon_small.gif&quot; style=&quot;border-bottom: 0px solid; border-left: 0px solid; width: 17px; height: 17px; border-top: 0px solid; border-right: 0px solid&quot; /&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/adv_uploads/Twin_Wildcat_IncidentReport.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Twin - Wildcat Lakes Incident Report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Stan Bones,&lt;br /&gt;
	Flathead National Forest&lt;br /&gt;
	February 17, 2012&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/incidentsdetail.cfm?recnum=66</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/incidentsdetail.cfm?recnum=66</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-02-17 hh:02:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Shed 4C (above the JF Stevens Canyon corridor)</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	The following is an observation submitted by Ted Steiner.</p>
<p>
	<span style="display: none">&nbsp;</span></p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width: 675px" width="675">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 263px">
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
					<tbody>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<div>
									<p align="center">
										BNSF RAILWAY AVALANCHE SAFETY</p>
									<p align="center">
										VOLUNTARY FIELD OBSERVATIONS</p>
									<p align="center">
										(406) 863-0476 Email: richard.steiner@bnsf.com</p>
									<p align="center">
										&nbsp;</p>
								</div>
							</td>
						</tr>
					</tbody>
				</table>
				&nbsp;
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<br clear="all" />
				<table align="left" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width: 648px" width="648">
					<tbody>
						<tr>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									DATE</p>
								<p align="center">
									SUBMITTED:</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									TIME SUBMITTED:</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									OBSERVATION LOCATION</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									OBSERVATION</p>
								<p align="center">
									DATE:</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 148px">
								<p align="center">
									SUBMITTED BY:</p>
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									2/16/2012</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									1600</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									Shed 4C/Burnout</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									2/14/2012</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 148px">
								<p align="center">
									Dundas</p>
							</td>
						</tr>
					</tbody>
				</table>
				<p>
					<strong><u>GENERAL INFORMATION:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Toured through the trees lookers right of shed 4C to the starting zone of the Burnout avalanche path.&nbsp; Conducted a full profile in the starting zone and descended the skiers left side of this path back to the rail grade.&nbsp; Ascent conditions were okay with 5&rdquo; of low density snow on top of a melt freeze crust.&nbsp; Descent was good due to the new snow buffering the breakable crust. &nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 58px">
				<p>
					<strong><u>WEATHER OBSERVATIONS:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Air temperatures averaged -2 C; skies were mostly clear with light West winds.&nbsp; No snow transport occurred during our tour.</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 100px">
				<p>
					<strong><u>SNOWPACK OBSERVATIONS:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Snow profile conducted on a southeast aspect was full depth at approximately 1700 m (5400 ft) elevation in the starting zone of Shed 4C.&nbsp; Snowpack was 75cm (30 in) in depth.&nbsp; The surface consisted of 15 cm of new low density snow that was poorly bonded to a 6 cm 1F hard melt freeze crust. Below the crust was a 5cm F hard layer of mixed forms which sat above a 3 cm K hard crust. Below this was a 7 cm F+ layer of facets which sat atop an 11 cm layer of 1F mixed forms.&nbsp; The remainder of the pack was a 5 cm layer of F hard depth hoar with a 23 cm layer of 1F depth hoar just above the ground.</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Stability tests consisted of Compression Tests. Failures occurred above and below both crusts and at the density change interface in the depth hoar. CT results were:</p>
				<p>
					CTV, CTE 1 &amp; 2 Q1 at 60 cm.</p>
				<p>
					CTE 4, 5 &amp; 5 Q2 at 54 cm</p>
				<p>
					CTE 8, 8 &amp; 9 Q2 at 46 cm</p>
				<p>
					CTM 12, 14 &amp; 15 Q2 at 28 cm</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 47px">
				<p>
					<strong><u>AVALANCHE OBSERVATIONS:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Recent avalanche activity was confined to the new snow layer.&nbsp; Small isolated loose slides and roller/sun balls were observed at low and mid elevations.</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>
				<div>
					<p>
						BNSF AVALANCHE SAFETY FIELD OBSERVATIONS SUBMITTED TO <strong><em>GLACIER</em></strong><strong><em>COUNTRY AVALANCHE CENTER</em></strong> AND <strong><em>GLACIER</em></strong><strong><em>NATIONAL PARK</em></strong> ARE BEING PROVIDEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED GLACIER NATIONAL PARK SPECIAL USE PERMIT.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						THESE OBSERVATIONS REPRESENT SITE SPECIFIC INFORMATION INTENDED FOR THE BNSF AVALANCHE SAFETY PROGRAM AND IN NO WAY ARE TO BE CONSTRUED AS A PUBLIC/ RECREATION AVALANCHE FORECAST.&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
				</div>
			</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=503</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=503</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-02-14 hh:02:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Rescue Creek</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Received this submission from a party that skied in Rescue creek last Saturday....</p>
<p>
	Toured to the saddle SE of Mt. Penrose.&nbsp; Climbed to the chute just SE of the prodiminate one with&nbsp; the 150 foot rock wall on the skiers left.&nbsp; My partner and I cut the cornice.&nbsp; It fractured 20 yards wide and 6 feet deep!&nbsp; Propigation ended 75 yards down slope.&nbsp; There wasnt much snow left in the chute.&nbsp; There was a good size pile when all was said and done.&nbsp; 120 yards wide.&nbsp; 5-6 feet deep.&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=502</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=502</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-02-11 hh:02:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Shed 11 (above JF Stevens Canyon corridor) by: Ted Steiner</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	This observation was submitted by Ted Steiner.</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width: 675px" width="675">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 263px">
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
					<tbody>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<div>
									<p align="center">
										BNSF RAILWAY AVALANCHE SAFETY</p>
									<p align="center">
										VOLUNTARY FIELD OBSERVATIONS</p>
									<p align="center">
										(406) 863-0476 Email: richard.steiner@bnsf.com</p>
									<p align="center">
										&nbsp;</p>
								</div>
							</td>
						</tr>
					</tbody>
				</table>
				&nbsp;
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<br clear="all" />
				<table align="left" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width: 648px" width="648">
					<tbody>
						<tr>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									DATE</p>
								<p align="center">
									SUBMITTED:</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									TIME SUBMITTED:</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									OBSERVATION LOCATION</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									OBSERVATION</p>
								<p align="center">
									DATE:</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 148px">
								<p align="center">
									SUBMITTED BY:</p>
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									2/7/2012</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									1600</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									Shed 10.7/11ridge</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									2/7/2012</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 148px">
								<p align="center">
									Dundas</p>
							</td>
						</tr>
					</tbody>
				</table>
				<p>
					<strong><u>GENERAL INFORMATION:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Toured up the shed 10.7/11 ridge to the shed 11 weather station.&nbsp; Conducted a full profile in the shed 11 starting zone and then descended the same ridge back to the highway.&nbsp; Ascent conditions were difficult due to a surface sun crust at all elevations.&nbsp; Ascent was manageable with ski crampons but the descent was difficult due to the unsupportive breakable crust. &nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 58px">
				<p>
					<strong><u>WEATHER OBSERVATIONS:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Air temperatures averaged -4 C; skies were bluebird with light EAST winds.&nbsp; No snow transport occurred during our tour.</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 100px">
				<p>
					<strong><u>SNOWPACK OBSERVATIONS:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Snow profile conducted on a southeast aspect was full depth at approximately 1878 m (6415 ft) elevation in the starting zone of Shed 11.&nbsp; Snowpack was 145cm (57 in) in depth.&nbsp; The surface consisted of sun affected surface hoar that sat atop 4 cm thick pencil hard sun crust.&nbsp; Below the crust was a 7 cm layer of F+ facets which were underlain by a 1cm pencil hard crust.&nbsp; The mid pack consisted of a variety of strong layers of mixed forms and crusts.&nbsp; The bottom 40 cm was 4F+ depth hoar that is beginning to round.</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Our main concerns in the pack are the surface crust/facet interface and the surface hoar that is sitting on top of the surface crust.&nbsp; &nbsp;We are also still concerned that a slab avalanche could step down into the weak basal depth hoar layer</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Stability tests consisted of Compression Tests.&nbsp; CT results were CTE 2, 3 &amp; 4 Q2 at the above mentioned surface crust/facet interface.&nbsp; CT results also occurred in the basal depth hoar (CTH 25 &amp; 26 x 2 Q2).</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 47px">
				<p>
					<strong><u>AVALANCHE OBSERVATIONS:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Recent avalanche activity observed included a sizable slab avalanche in the surface new snow layer in the head of Sheep Creek which is outside of our program area.&nbsp; Numerous wet loose debris and roller/sun balls were observed at all elevations in the program area.&nbsp; These were confined to the surface snow and occurred during the recent sunny warm weather.</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>
				<div>
					<p>
						BNSF AVALANCHE SAFETY FIELD OBSERVATIONS SUBMITTED TO <strong><em>GLACIER</em></strong><strong><em>COUNTRY AVALANCHE CENTER</em></strong> AND <strong><em>GLACIER</em></strong><strong><em>NATIONAL PARK</em></strong> ARE BEING PROVIDEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED GLACIER NATIONAL PARK SPECIAL USE PERMIT.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						THESE OBSERVATIONS REPRESENT SITE SPECIFIC INFORMATION INTENDED FOR THE BNSF AVALANCHE SAFETY PROGRAM AND IN NO WAY ARE TO BE CONSTRUED AS A PUBLIC/ RECREATION AVALANCHE FORECAST.&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
				</div>
			</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=501</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=501</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-02-07 hh:02:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Skiumah/Rescue Ridge</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Toured along the Skiumah/Cascade ridge today. &nbsp;Overnight snow accumulations of 8-16 inches. &nbsp;Breakable crust below ~5200 ft. &nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Remotely triggered an avalanche on a NE aspect at ~6000 ft. from 20 ft. away. &nbsp;Crown ranged from 6-18 inches. &nbsp;Slope was wind loaded from STRONG SW winds (nearby weather station at Shed 7 reported 80+ mph gusts). &nbsp;Pit dug on avalanche crown. &nbsp;Failure layer was interface of new/wind loaded snow and old snow. &nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Isolated cracking on other aspects as well. &nbsp;</p>
<p>
	<a class="highslide" href="/adv_uploads/2012_0125CascadeCreek.jpg" onclick="return hs.expand(this)"> <img alt="Highslide JS" src="/adv_uploads/2012_0125CascadeCreek.jpg" title="Click to enlarge image" width="300" /></a></p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/R2eO2LKtT08" width="420"></iframe></p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=500</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=500</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-01-25 hh:01:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Shed 4D &amp; Burnout by Ted Steiner</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	The following observation was submitted by Ted Steiner. This is from the ridge line that extends from Running Rabbit to the Sheilds &amp; Snowslip area above highway 2 in the John F. Stevens Canyon, east of Essex.</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width: 675px" width="675">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 263px">
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
					<tbody>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<div>
									<p align="center">
										BNSF RAILWAY AVALANCHE SAFETY</p>
									<p align="center">
										VOLUNTARY FIELD OBSERVATIONS</p>
									<p align="center">
										(406) 863-0476 Email: richard.steiner@bnsf.com</p>
									<p align="center">
										&nbsp;</p>
								</div>
							</td>
						</tr>
					</tbody>
				</table>
				&nbsp;
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<br clear="all" />
				<table align="left" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width: 648px" width="648">
					<tbody>
						<tr>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									DATE</p>
								<p align="center">
									SUBMITTED:</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									TIME SUBMITTED:</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									OBSERVATION LOCATION</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									OBSERVATION</p>
								<p align="center">
									DATE:</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 148px">
								<p align="center">
									SUBMITTED BY:</p>
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									1/24/2012</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									1700</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									Shed 4D SZ &amp; Burnout SZ</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									1/24/2012</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 148px">
								<p align="center">
									Steiner</p>
							</td>
						</tr>
					</tbody>
				</table>
				<p>
					<strong><u>GENERAL INFORMATION:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Toured up the Burnout avalanche path and continued up and over to the starting zone of Shed 4D.&nbsp; Conducted full profile in the 4D starting zone and then descended to the Burnout starting zone and conducted a second profile.&nbsp; Ascent conditions were excellent and descent was excellent above1676 m (5,500 feet).&nbsp; From 1676 m to Canyon floor skiing was tricky due to a buried rain crust that is now 10 cm (4 inches) beneath snow surface. Rain crust was added to snowpack last Saturday, 1/21/12. &nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 58px">
				<p>
					<strong><u>WEATHER OBSERVATIONS:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Air temperatures today averaged -4 C, skies were overcast with no precipitation, and WEST winds were increasing throughout the day.&nbsp; By the end of the day, windloading was active at ridgetop elevations on EAST and NORTHEAST aspects..</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 100px">
				<p>
					<strong><u>SNOWPACK OBSERVATIONS:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Snow profile conducted on a southeast aspect was full depth at approximately 1768 m (5800 ft) elevation in the starting zone of Shed 4D.&nbsp; Snowpack was 157 cm (62 in) with the upper quarter (1/4) composed of new snow and mixed forms (facets &amp; rounds.) The next quarter of the snowpack consisted of a 15 cm 1F hardness layer atop a sandwich of facets and decomposing crusts.&nbsp; Beneath this, the bottom half (1/2)&nbsp; of the snowpack was comprised of yet more mixed forms/ decomposing crusts and well established depth hoar up to 2mm in size.</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Stability tests consisted of both ECT and CT.&nbsp; ECT results were all ECTN.&nbsp; CT results were conclusive (CT15 Q2 x 2) on a decomposing crust located 95 cm from the ground or 62 cm from the surface of the profile.</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 47px">
				<p>
					<strong><u>AVALANCHE OBSERVATIONS:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					No recent avalanche activity observed.&nbsp; However, widespread, small (D1), low elevation natural activity did occur on 1/21/2012 and entrained recently fallen snow as well as old snow.&nbsp; Some releases extended in depth to the ground.&nbsp; Activity was limited to steep cutbanks/ rock faces.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>
				<div>
					<p>
						BNSF AVALANCHE SAFETY FIELD OBSERVATIONS SUBMITTED TO <strong><em>GLACIER</em></strong><strong><em>COUNTRY AVALANCHE CENTER</em></strong> AND <strong><em>GLACIER</em></strong><strong><em>NATIONAL PARK</em></strong> ARE BEING PROVIDEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED GLACIER NATIONAL PARK SPECIAL USE PERMIT.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						THESE OBSERVATIONS REPRESENT SITE SPECIFIC INFORMATION INTENDED FOR THE BNSF AVALANCHE SAFETY PROGRAM AND IN NO WAY ARE TO BE CONSTRUED AS A PUBLIC/ RECREATION AVALANCHE FORECAST.&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
				</div>
			</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=499</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=499</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-01-24 hh:01:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Advanced Avalanche Awareness for Snowmobilers</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Classroom sessions January 23, 25, 30 &amp; February 1, 6:30 to 9:30 pm. Field sessions TBD. Class is free. No registration required.</p>
<p>
	Flathead National Forest, Kalispell office, 650 Wolfpack Way.</p>
<p>
	Speakers: Stan Bones &amp; Tony Willits</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/eventsdetail.cfm?eventid=269</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/eventsdetail.cfm?eventid=269</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-01-23 hh:01:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Shields (aka Palindrome or Little Shields)</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Toured up Shields on Sunday. The rain line from Saturday was at 5,500&#39;. Above that elevation snow quality was good. Even with a dense 4&quot; top layer the stability was remarkably good. Hard and poor quality shears with no propagation. Winds were light, mostly cloudy with some sun. There was no evidence of wind transport of the snow from the storm of the previous days.&nbsp;Trail breaking was moderate. Below&nbsp;5,500&#39; there was breakable crust, almost like a trap crust. Regardless, the ski out was managable down the long east gully. Whumphing below 5,000&#39; in the forest as we made our way towards the Feilding cabin.<span style="display: none">&nbsp;</span></p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=498</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=498</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-01-22 hh:01:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Little Shields by Ted Steiner</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width: 675px" width="675">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 263px">
				<p>
					This was submitted by Ted Steiner.</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
					<tbody>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<div>
									<p align="center">
										BNSF RAILWAY AVALANCHE SAFETY</p>
									<p align="center">
										VOLUNTARY FIELD OBSERVATIONS</p>
									<p align="center">
										(406) 863-0476 Email: richard.steiner@bnsf.com</p>
									<p align="center">
										&nbsp;</p>
								</div>
							</td>
						</tr>
					</tbody>
				</table>
				&nbsp;
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<br clear="all" />
				<table align="left" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width: 648px" width="648">
					<tbody>
						<tr>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									DATE</p>
								<p align="center">
									SUBMITTED:</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									TIME SUBMITTED:</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									OBSERVATION LOCATION</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									OBSERVATION</p>
								<p align="center">
									DATE:</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 148px">
								<p align="center">
									SUBMITTED BY:</p>
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									1/22/2012</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 120px">
								<p align="center">
									0800</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									MountShields</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 130px">
								<p align="center">
									1/20/2012</p>
							</td>
							<td style="width: 148px">
								<p align="center">
									Steiner</p>
							</td>
						</tr>
					</tbody>
				</table>
				<p>
					<strong><u>GENERAL INFORMATION:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Toured today with Jason Grizwold, District Ranger for Glacier National Park, up the southeastern aspect of Mount Shields to the south ridge of &ldquo;Little Shields.&rdquo;&nbsp; Continued on ridgeline to an elevation of 6900 feet elevation. &nbsp;Touring was slow due to trail breaking in up to 60 cm of new low density and wind transported snow.&nbsp; Descended northeast exposure of Little Shields to skier&rsquo;s right treed ridge&hellip;&nbsp; Followed this ridgeline feature to the Fielding Creek Drainage.&nbsp; Skiing conditions on upper third were excellent, middle third satisfactory, and lower third tolerable but slow going as low density snow was covering (hiding) numerous hazardous obstacles. &nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 58px">
				<p>
					<strong><u>WEATHER OBSERVATIONS:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Temperatures had been warming all night previous to tour and at start of tour air temp at the Canyon floor was</p>
				<p>
					-8C (17F) and at high point air T was -4.8 C (23F).&nbsp; Light snow showers throughout the day. Southwest winds gusting moderate to strong&hellip;&nbsp; Snow transport onto northeast exposures.</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 100px">
				<p>
					<strong><u>SNOWPACK OBSERVATIONS:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					Snow profile conducted on a northeasterly aspect was full depth at approximately 2106 m (6910 ft) elevation on Little Shields.&nbsp; Snowpack was 157 cm (62 in) consisting of mainly new snow and mixed forms in the upper half of snowpack and mixed forms to well developed facets in lower half.&nbsp; Hardness in upper third was Fist, middle third 4F+ and, lower third Fist.&nbsp; In this profile, middle third of snowpack was bridging an otherwise unconsolidated snowpack.&nbsp; Stability tests were limited to Compression Tests with no extraordinary results.&nbsp; CT 13 and a CT12 both Q2 were main focus and found on a decomposing crust layer approximately 55 cm from snowpack surface.&nbsp; This layer was not observed in sidewall profile examination.</p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="width: 675px; height: 47px">
				<p>
					<strong><u>AVALANCHE OBSERVATIONS:</u></strong></p>
				<p>
					&nbsp;</p>
				<p>
					No natural avalanche activity observed.&nbsp; However, low elevation natural activity did occur on 1/19/2012 and was limited to recently fallen new snow on steep cutbanks/ rock faces.&nbsp; On our approach to Little Shields we did have some localized shooting cracks at lower elevations and occasional audible collapsing.&nbsp; Cornice drops onto northeast exposures at approximately 1676 m (5,500 ft) resulted in no slab releases. &nbsp;</p>
			</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>
				<div>
					<p>
						BNSF AVALANCHE SAFETY FIELD OBSERVATIONS SUBMITTED TO <strong><em>GLACIER</em></strong><strong><em>COUNTRY AVALANCHE CENTER</em></strong> AND <strong><em>GLACIER</em></strong><strong><em>NATIONAL PARK</em></strong> ARE BEING PROVIDEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED GLACIER NATIONAL PARK SPECIAL USE PERMIT.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						THESE OBSERVATIONS REPRESENT SITE SPECIFIC INFORMATION INTENDED FOR THE BNSF AVALANCHE SAFETY PROGRAM AND IN NO WAY ARE TO BE CONSTRUED AS A PUBLIC/ RECREATION AVALANCHE FORECAST.&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
					<p>
						&nbsp;</p>
				</div>
			</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=497</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=497</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-01-20 hh:01:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Marion Lake</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Toured into Marion Lake on Saturday on the well used trail. Obviously a lot of ski traffic up there over the past week. I suppose this is becoming the Flatheads version&nbsp;of Rogers&nbsp;Pass.&nbsp;Decided to ski the north face of Essex Mtn. Did a pit at 6,600&#39;. Total snow depth of 170 cm. The weak, unconsolidated December layer is now 110 cm down and is the most reactive. CT16Q3 and ECTN The snow gets more firm the closer you get to that layer ranging from fist to one finger. I was able to lift the entire block in one piece. At that interface back to fist hardness. Decided to do some trail braking on the way to the top just to see what it was like; moderate. Skiing was good. The surface had some minor wind effect. Winds were gusty with some snow squals moving through.</p>
<p>
	There is a lot of alder and brush still showing. The south facing slopes off the Marion Dickey ridge are very brushy. People have been skiing there but you are not going to get a clean shot from top to bottom for sure. The head of the lake looks like a better option but not that day. The wind was pretty fierce once out on the lake. The lower slopes of Essex north face are totally brushy. That said I was able to pick my way through on the exit. Forget about skiing&nbsp;Back Door as the brush is showing top to bottom. Skiing out on the trail was tolerable. Also, the route up to the Middle Ridge from the BMW sign is impassable on skis. Needless to say, we need more snow.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=496</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=496</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-01-14 hh:01:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Heavy Snow Expected</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	The National Weather Service sent this out today. It&#39;s great to see that we may finally get more winter like. Should this happen expect the hazard rating to rise. You will also see something posted on the GCAC Facebook about this event.</p>
<p>
	*******************************************************************************************************</p>
<p>
	Hey Folks,</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Since you all follow the weather pretty closely you may already be aware of the big pattern change for next week.&nbsp; We (NWS) are often pretty cautious and conservative about impacts that far out, but there is high confidence in this event.&nbsp; Valley impacts are still somewhat uncertain, but the mountains should acquire several to numerous feet of new snow next week with the heaviest likely from Wednesday through the weekend.&nbsp; During that period the Clearwaters of northern Idaho and the Bitterroots could receive up to 5 inches of SWE.&nbsp; Models are painting just a bit less than that over the Rattlesnakes and the mountains of NW Montana, but stay tuned.&nbsp; It will depend on exact placement of the moisture plume of course.</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	The initial front/upper trough will move in this weekend/early in the coming week, but those typically result in inches of snow.&nbsp; But later next week we should be talking feet.&nbsp; Think we are going to mention something to this effect on our Facebook page <a href="http://www.facebook.com/US.NationalWeatherService.Missoula.gov">http://www.facebook.com/US.NationalWeatherService.Missoula.gov</a>.&nbsp; In the NWS that media is really meant to keep a weather-related conversation going.</p>
<p>
	Our next posting may generate some comments or questions (hopefully) on how this will afffect the backcountry conditions.&nbsp; You experts are encouraged to respond or initiate comments on that page.</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	You are welcome to pass this on to your field observers.</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Marty&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=495</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=495</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-01-13 hh:01:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Elk Mountain</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Went and did a bit of Recon off the ridge toward Autumn Creek on Elk Mountain</p>
<p>
	Elevation 5800 ft NE Aspect wind 5-15mph w temp 30C</p>
<p>
	80 cm snow pit depth down to ground</p>
<p>
	ECT 29 Q1 at the ground</p>
<p>
	ECT 7 Q1 on Facets under a 10CM ice lens 30cms into the snow pack</p>
<p>
	Both results in the same pit!!!</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Powder conditions with 3-4 inches on the surface with two major ice crust layers with facets below.&nbsp; ECT tests showed variation within the pit.&nbsp; Ground was not frozen and mud was soft.&nbsp; Wind had deposited soft slabs in the area with volital results just below the 10CM ice lensunder a 30cm soft slab.&nbsp; Forest conditions showed less instability within the shaded and protected areas.&nbsp; Pit was in an open area with obvious snow loading and transport.&nbsp; It appears without some investigation that the snow pack is incredibly stable, the deeper you look the less it appears that way.&nbsp; I am going to say my results were less than conclusive with variability in snow pack and stability.&nbsp; Let&#39;s keep the opbservations coming in so we can all benifit from any data available.&nbsp; I will continue to post info as I get it.&nbsp; The parking lots at Autumn Creek, Cascadilla, Rescue Creek and Feilding all had cars parked in them on Sunday.&nbsp; No visible natural slides or other signs of instability.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=494</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=494</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-01-08 hh:01:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Advanced Avalanche Awareness for Skiers, Snowboarders &amp; Snowshoers</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Class room sessions January 3, 5, 10 &amp; 12, 6:30 to 9:30 pm. Field session January 7 &amp; 14. Class is free. No registration required.</p>
<p>
	Flathead National Forest, Kalispell Office, 650 Wolfpack Way.</p>
<p>
	Speakers: Stan Bones &amp; Tony Willits.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/eventsdetail.cfm?eventid=268</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/eventsdetail.cfm?eventid=268</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-01-03 hh:01:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Peak 7798</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Toured into Peak 7798 and along the way tested slope stability by, among other things, dropping large cornices on the slope. &nbsp;Very satisfying. &nbsp;No avalanches produced upon dropping cornices on NE and E aspects. &nbsp;Just some minor sluffing of surface snow. &nbsp;Some small pockets of wind slab on wind loaded slopes observed, but no propagation of a fracture.</p>
<p>
	As the day progressed, lower elevation and S facing aspects became sun affected and new snow turned heavy. &nbsp;Natural point releases on SE aspects along Marion/Dickey Ridge of Pk. 7798 (photo). &nbsp;In the mid- to late afternoon, winds from the SW increased to moderate (20-30 mph) thus causing wind loading.</p>
<p>
	<a class="highslide" href="/adv_uploads/PointRelease.jpg" onclick="return hs.expand(this)"> <img alt="Highslide JS" src="/adv_uploads/PointRelease.jpg" title="Click to enlarge image" width="300" /></a></p>
<p>
	Image 1: Natural point releases on Marion/Dickey Ridge on SE aspect. &nbsp;Appears as if it tried to pull out a slab on looker&#39;s right of slide.</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	<a class="highslide" href="/adv_uploads/EssexDebris0102_2012.jpg" onclick="return hs.expand(this)"> <img alt="Highslide JS" src="/adv_uploads/EssexDebris0102_2012.jpg" title="Click to enlarge image" width="300" /></a></p>
<p>
	Image 2: Debris from avalanche path into Essex Creek. &nbsp;Appears to have occurred during last week&#39;s wet storm as this debris looks like it entrained a lot of wet, heavy snow as it crossed Essex Creek! &nbsp;Crown from this slide was about 1/2 to 3/4 of the way up the avalanche path. &nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=493</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=493</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-01-02 hh:01:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>National Avalanche Center: Dissertation &amp; Thesis</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	From:</p>
<p>
	Karl Birkeland, Acting Director and Avalanche Scientist</p>
<p>
	USDA Forest Service National Avalanche Center<span style="display: none">&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>
	If you&#39;ve been at some of the various snow and avalanche workshops or the NAC meeting this fall, you&#39;ve heard about some of the great graduate work that Ned Bair and Zach Guy have done. Ned recently finished his dissertation and Zach recently finished his thesis.&nbsp; If you are the kind of person that likes to read about all the details, I&#39;ve just posted their documents up on the NAC website:</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Bair, E.H. 2011. Fracture mechanical and statistical properties of avalanches that fail on nonpersistent snow crystals. Ph.D. Dissertation, Bren School of Environmental Science, University of California at Santa Barbara, 188 pp.&nbsp; &nbsp;<a href="http://www.fsavalanche.org/NAC/techPages/theses/bair.pdf">http://www.fsavalanche.org/NAC/techPages/theses/bair.pdf</a></p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Guy, Z.M. 2011. The influence of terrain parameters on the spatial variability of potential avalanche trigger locations in complex avalanche terrain. M.S. Thesis, Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, 245 pp.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.fsavalanche.org/NAC/techPages/theses/guy.pdf">http://www.fsavalanche.org/NAC/techPages/theses/guy.pdf</a></p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Great stuff!</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Hope you are all having a good start to winter.</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/eventsdetail.cfm?eventid=273</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/eventsdetail.cfm?eventid=273</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2012-01-01 hh:01:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Devil Creek</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Toured into Devil creek today. Minimal snow coverage at the trailhead with just enough fresh to make the touring pleasant. Appeared that rain turned to snow overnight with the rain line up to about 5,000&#39;. Observed some natural releases on very steep chutes through the cliffs at the upper end of the valley, class 2. Snow depth and quality improved greatly at about 5,800&#39;. Did a pit on a north aspect at 6,400&#39;. Snow depth is 170 cm, two recent storm layers in the top 80 cm, 40 cm each. CT14 at 40 cm Q2, CT18 at 80 cm, Q3. Both revealed buried surface hoar. Below that there is a rain or melt freeze layer, pencil hard about 5 cm thick, on top of loose and uncosolidated snow of fist hardness (pretty rotten). Did an extended column as well, ECTN. Skiing was excellent but there is a lot of brush poking through yet. Difficult to find a clean shot top to bottom. Trail breaking in the upper elevations was moderate. Did not ski the south facing slopes on the other side of the valley. From afar&nbsp;the coverage appeared to be too thin. Pretty brushy in that valley for this time of year.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=492</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=492</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-12-31 hh:12:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Near Doris Point Avy Activity</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	I cut and pasted this from an email submission from snowmobilers. Here it is:</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Riding at the lake onto or at the end of trail 895H (Near Doris&#39; Point). One area of steep area of slope had previously avanlached. Later another portion of slope let go up to tree line, approximately 6&quot;. Against better judgement we decided to stay in area because we observed areas remaining had some tree cover. That area then let go up high and swept one rider off machine who was lower on less steep portion, leaving rider partially buried and sled mostly buried. Area was approx. 100&#39; + wide and about 4-5&#39; deep at bottom. Nearly missed another rider and third rider was in a safe area. In the end we got off very lucky and the incident was a result of bad judgement given signs observed. Very unstable conditions exist. In all cases it appeared that new snow layer released.&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=490</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=490</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-12-30 hh:12:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Essex</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	&nbsp;Loads of bullseye clues of instability present today - recent avalanche activity, cracking, collapsing, heavy new snow, wind loading. &nbsp;Warm, moist storm system deposited app. 45-60 cm of new storm snow on a variety of surfaces depending upon aspect. &nbsp; Experienced collapsing and cracking on E and SE aspects during one descent (none on ascent), but no avalanche activity on this aspect. &nbsp;However, recent natural avalanche activity on steep N aspects down to Marion Lake (photo). &nbsp;Previous and current wind loading from the southwest.</p>
<p>
	Pit on ESE aspect revealed a thin layer of decomposing buried surface hoar (2-4 mm, ~45 cm from surface in this pit) above an old MF crust that propagated with moderate force in ECTs. &nbsp;</p>
<p>
	No propagation on same layer on N aspect in ECTs - no crust present either. &nbsp;Just a very thin layer of buried variable surface hoar that appears to be decomposing and bonding to adjacent layers (new snow and old decomposing precip particles) on this aspect. &nbsp;However, did note recent natural avalanche activity on multiple steep N-facing slopes across canyon as mentioned above. &nbsp;This thin surface hoar layer seems to be variable across space and variable in strength. &nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Rain crust on surface to about 5500 feet. &nbsp;Above that......SNOW!</p>
<p>
	Image 1: Recent natural avalanche activity on multiple, steep North facing aspects. &nbsp;Debris barely visible at bottom of chutes on edge of lake.</p>
<p>
	<a class="highslide" href="/adv_uploads/2011-12-29_Nfacing1.jpg" onclick="return hs.expand(this)"> <img alt="Highslide JS" src="/adv_uploads/2011-12-29_Nfacing1.jpg" title="Click to enlarge image" width="300" /></a></p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Image 2: &nbsp;Snowpit from ESE aspect. &nbsp;N facing aspect on other side of ridge harbors similar surface hoar layer but not on top of crust and also appears to be rounding. &nbsp;Quite variable layer it seems.</p>
<p>
	<a class="highslide" href="/adv_uploads/2011_1229MarionLake.jpg" onclick="return hs.expand(this)"> <img alt="Highslide JS" src="/adv_uploads/2011_1229MarionLake.jpg" title="Click to enlarge image" width="300" /></a></p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=489</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=489</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-12-29 hh:12:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Back Side of Big Mtn</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	This is cut and pasted from an email submitted by a snowmobiler touring behind Big Mtn.</p>
<p>
	We saw many natural avalanches today on south west facing slopes starting at 6 to 7000 ft and running to the bottom of the runouts, several across the snowmobile trails.Went on the road to the west of werner peak with several small avalanches across the road. I would agree with the high rating.&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=491</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=491</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-12-29 hh:12:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Big Mtn Back &amp; Side Country Avy Activity</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	I received two reports from very credible sources of recent avy activity near Big Mtn.</p>
<p>
	Skookeleel aka Dorothy&#39;s on Dec. 26 report of a soft slab, size 2 (60 cm x 60 m x unknown length) skier triggered on a NE aspect on a 35 degree slobe at 6500&#39;. Failure occured by kicking a small cornice block on the NE wind loaded slope, propagating fractures along the entire length of the crown, subsequent release upon approach on skis. Isolated natural releases on similar aspects and elevations. This occured before the recent rain event.</p>
<p>
	Big Mtn Side Country on Dec. 28 report of natural and skier triggered activity. Apparent natural release on the high road leading from the resort to the pass between Canyon and Big creeks. This is the road above the route skiers return to the resort on coming from Canyon creek. Skiers noted a release from the steep north facing road cut jusst past the resort boundary&nbsp;onto the high road running to the lower return road. This buried an existing skin track put in that morning. This same group then toured towards Gooley&#39;s and triggered a release on the steep NE aspect above the small pond by jumping on the ridge. Remote trigger. 18&quot; crown x length unknown.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=488</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=488</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-12-28 hh:12:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Avy Awareness Town Hall Series</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Thursday, December 22, 2011, 6 to 7 pm at the Whitefish Library.</p>
<p>
	Erich Peitzsch, USGS Avalanche Specialist, Avlanche Forecaster for the Glacier National Park road crew.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/eventsdetail.cfm?eventid=271</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/eventsdetail.cfm?eventid=271</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-12-22 hh:12:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Shed 7, John F. Stevens Canyon</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Observations from Shed 7 area in John F. Stevens Canyon in the southern edge of Glacier National Park. &nbsp;Relatively shallow snowpack consisting of various layers of facets and facets turning to rounded particles most likely due to the moderate temperatures we&#39;ve had the past week. &nbsp;No recent avalanche activity, cracking, or collapsing of the snowpack. &nbsp;VERY brushy below 5000 feet. &nbsp;A couple of thin layers of facets in the snowpack that showed a tendency to fracture, but our ECT results showed no propogation (see snowpit). &nbsp;However, the general nature of the entire snowpack appears to be one that will be interesting to watch react to the next notable loading event (storm). &nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	<a class="highslide" href="/adv_uploads/2011_1220Shed7.jpg" onclick="return hs.expand(this)"> <img alt="Highslide JS" src="/adv_uploads/2011_1220Shed7.jpg" title="Click to enlarge image" width="300" /></a></p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="300" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/HJ6XUrcZmoM" width="500"></iframe></p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=487</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=487</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-12-20 hh:12:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Peak 7798</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Observations from Peak 7798 area. &nbsp;No recent avalanche activity, collapsing, or cracking. &nbsp;Partly cloudy skies and no precipitation. &nbsp;A very thin freezing fog crust developed on the surface Friday night/Saturday morning on open slopes below 6500 feet. &nbsp;Snow surface above this elevation was not affected by freezing fog/mist. &nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Snowpit (total snow depth on N aspect was 130 cm) revealed a facet/crust/facet sandwich located near the ground in the snowpack. This sandwich is less than appetizing because of the mixed results we saw in our stability tests. &nbsp;This layer did not propagate in our extended column tests (ECT). &nbsp;This layer did fracture on the facets above the crust in our compression tests (CT) with moderate force. &nbsp;So, despite it not propagating, I am definitely keeping my eye on this layer particularly when we have our first notable loading event (i.e. lots of weight added to the snowpack during the next storm). &nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Strong wind (gusts over 50 mph....nearly knocking us over)&nbsp;&nbsp;from the SW was transporting some snow creating isolated windslabs on lee sides of ridges. &nbsp;These slabs did not appear to be widespread much below the ridges, but there were isolated pockets. &nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	<a class="highslide" href="/adv_uploads/20111_1217_Peak7798.jpg" onclick="return hs.expand(this)"> <img alt="Highslide JS" src="/adv_uploads/20111_1217_Peak7798.jpg" title="Click to enlarge image" width="300" /></a></p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=486</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=486</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-12-17 hh:12:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Northwest Montana Early Season Backcountry Snow and Avalanche Safety Presentation</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p align="center">
	<strong>Northwest Montana Early Season Backcountry Snow and</strong></p>
<p align="center">
	<strong>Avalanche Safety Presentation</strong></p>
<p align="center">
	<strong>--Avalanche Advisories Underway--</strong></p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	The Flathead National Forest is hosting a free presentation about early-season backcountry snow and avalanche conditions in Northwest Montana on Tuesday, December 13, 6:30-9:30pm at the Flathead National Forest Office in Kalispell, 650 Wolfpack Way.&nbsp; Forest Service Avalanche Specialist Stan Bones will present the evening session.</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	The presentation will focus on the weather in Northwest Montana, including typical weather patterns, websites that display current mountain weather conditions and forecasts, and how to interpret the data and forecasts.&nbsp; A discussion regarding the fall and early winter weather to date, and how these conditions affect snow and avalanche conditions will also be held.&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Bones will discuss last season&rsquo;s conditions and how the weather set the stage for the January 2011 Doris Ridge Fatal Avalanche Incident. Bones will also review how avalanche advisories are formulated, the North American Avalanche Danger Scale and the new local advisory format.</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	The session will be an open discussion with an emphasis on a question-and-answer format.&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	The session is free and open to all.&nbsp; There is no registration.&nbsp; Please call the Flathead National Forest at 758-5284 or visit <a href="http://www.fs.usda.gov/flathead">www.fs.usda.gov/flathead</a>for more information.&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	<strong>Avalanche Advisories for Northwest Montana Underway</strong></p>
<p>
	The Flathead National Forest issues avalanche advisories for Northwest Montana throughout the winter, beginning the first Friday in December or as weather conditions warrant.&nbsp; Advisories are issued once a week, on Friday mornings, until the third week in December, when they are issued Tuesday and Friday mornings (as weather conditions warrant) until April. Advisories include information about snowpack conditions, weather forecasts, and hazard evaluations.&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Advisories are posted on the Flathead National Forest website, <a href="http://www.fs.usda.gov/flathead">http://www.fs.usda.gov/flathead</a></p>
<p>
	and on the Glacier Country Avalanche Center website, <a href="http://www.glacieravalanche.org">www.glacieravalanche.org</a>.&nbsp; The advisory can also be accessed by calling 406-257-8702.&nbsp; Anyone traveling in the backcountry will always need to make their own time and site specific avalanche hazard evaluations.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/eventsdetail.cfm?eventid=272</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/eventsdetail.cfm?eventid=272</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-12-13 hh:12:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Flattop &amp; Elkcalf</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Wall to wall wind hammer, complex snow pack. I am finding up to 24&quot; of snow on north and east aspects, less elsewhere. My pit revealed two buried surface hoar layers mid pack and the bottom 4&quot; being loose faceted sugar snow. The wind hammer is sitting on top of a buried surface hoar layer and failed RB1Q1 (first step on to the block). Compression tests were highly variable but all failed to ground, completely bypassing the wind hammer layer. In protected areas there is&nbsp;surface hoar on top of the snow.&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	I suspect these long, dry cold periods are not helping what little snow we have. Maybe a rain storm would be good? Skiing was poor but at least the sun was out. Temps were warm; mid 20&#39;s to start the day, mid 30&#39;s at the end of the day. The temps were not affecting snow consistency on&nbsp;the surface.&nbsp;Winds were high out of the SW. Travel conditions were easy with minimal penetrations.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=485</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=485</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-12-10 hh:12:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Whitefish Mountain (Near Red Meadow)</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Location. &quot;Wesley&#39;s Bowl&quot;&nbsp; South Side of Whitefish Mtn</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;Activity. AIARE Snowmobile LevelI Avalanche Course</p>
<p>
	Observation. 12 Snowmobiling L1 Students made multiple observations on many aspects and elevations between 5800&#39; - 6400&#39; under supervision from AIARE instructors.</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;Obs. Avg Snow depth@ 6000&#39;: 85cm. 3 Layers of concern found on varied aspects at 6000-6200&#39;:</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;1. 10 - 15 cm of 5mm Facets/Depth hoar at ground failed at CTE Q2 in several compression Tests. ECTN in all tests. Note that these failure occurs on a grassy slope with lack of anchoring.</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;2. Buried surface hoar/rimed grains @ 20-25 from surface. Found these in 2 test pits over 1/2 mile apart. CTM Q1 in several compression tests. ECTN in all tests.&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;3. Near surface facets at 5 cm from surface are insulated by new snow. Easy Tilt tests identified this layer on most aspects/elevations. Will be a concern depending on how upcoming weather/snow arrives.&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;Results.</p>
<p>
	Quality riding to be had despite low coverage. Side-hilling on small scale steeper convexities produced no results. We decided to look out for uniform snow cover on slopes lacking sufficient vegetative anchoring. Look out for buried stumps, rocks, and logs!</p>
<p>
	Good course with participants from Winter Wonderland Tours guides, Border Patrol, local and SAR groups.</p>
<p>
	Posted by Joe Grabowski&nbsp;from an observation by&nbsp;Ryan Murray with Cascade Powder Cats&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=483</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=483</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-12-06 hh:12:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Flower Point / Etc.</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Toured in the Flower Point &amp; Lodi area on Saturday. Coverage is pretty sparse making it difficult to ski anything other than a cut run. For instance, too many woody weeds poking through on the Window Pane face to make it worthwhile. Snow depth was variable; between 18&quot; to 36&quot; above 6,000&#39;. Did a pit on the Canyon Creek side of Flower. That&#39;s where I found the 36&quot; of snow. Found three distinct layers - first at about 4&quot; (loose faceted October snow), second at 18&quot; that went cleanly with a shovel shear, third was the hoar frost forming at the surface. Entire snow pack&nbsp;was one finger hardness. CT29 Q3 at the ground. Touring was easy with ankle deep penetrations. Skiing was enjoyable where you can find it. Kind of like sugary powder. Winds were calm, some sun early but mostly cloudy. Coverage on the far side of the canyon looked decent but the runouts are alder choked. Skiing within the WMR boundary on the developed runs is treacherous with the snowcats packing down the snow surface.</p>
<p>
	There are enough ski tracks out there to make the untracked experience nearly impossible. Some skiers are bolder than me. I did observe tracks through the weeds at lower elevations.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=479</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=479</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-12-03 hh:12:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Avy Awareness Town Hall Series / Whitefish Library</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Ready for winter backcountry travel? &nbsp;Join us for an engaging&nbsp;presentation&nbsp;about general information about avalanche hazard, how to avoid it, and proper equipment for traveling in avalanche terrain.&nbsp;&nbsp;Time will be allowed for Q &amp; A.<span style="display: none">&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>
	Speaker: Erich Peitzsch, USGS Avalanche Specialist, Forecaster for Glacier National Park road crew.<span style="display: none">&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>
	Tuesday, November 29, 6 to 7 pm.</p>
<p>
	Whitefish Library.</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/eventsdetail.cfm?eventid=270</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/eventsdetail.cfm?eventid=270</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-11-29 hh:11:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Swan Range</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Skied in the Jewel Basin area today. &nbsp;A pit on a NE aspect at about 7000 ft. revealed 80 cm snow depth. &nbsp;The layer of biggest concern to us was a thin (1 cm) layer of facets (size 1-2 mm) about 65 cm down from the snow surface (~15 cm from the ground). &nbsp;These facets sit on top of a knife hard ice crust from late October, and are underneath a slab that starts at fist hardness from the snow surface and progresses to 1 finger hardness above the facets.</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;Our stability tests showed that this layer has the potential to propagate a fracture with hard force (ECTP 21, Q1). &nbsp;Partly sunny skies dominated today, but a constant WSW wind (20-30 mph) was transporting any surface snow available for transport. &nbsp;We experienced no collapsing or cracking today, and did not see any recent avalanche activity. &nbsp; Ski penetration was ~5-15 cm with a very supportable base underneath. &nbsp;Overall good skiing to just below 6000 ft.</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	<a class="highslide" href="/adv_uploads/1127_2011JewelBasin.jpg" onclick="return hs.expand(this)"> <img alt="Highslide JS" src="/adv_uploads/1127_2011JewelBasin.jpg" title="Click to enlarge image" width="300" /></a></p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=477</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=477</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-11-27 hh:11:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>Flattop &amp; Elkcalf</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Toured around Flattop and Elkcalf on Thanksgiving day. Coverage was better than expected with up to 24&quot; of snow depth. Did a couple of pits on east and northeast aspects. My radar was up due to the occasional settlement and some cracking around the ski tips. Found that the top 3/4 of the snow pack was nicely consolidated but this was sitting on top of loose, rounded grained, rotten snow with a hard ice crust from the October storms. CT15 to CT18 Q2 at that October ice layer. Touring and skiing conditions were pretty good above 5,500&#39; with minimal ski penetrations. Below 5,500&#39; it was above freezing to start the day even though there was some fresh snow. That froze on the way back to the car with a little ice crust developing.&nbsp;High west winds at ridge top level.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=478</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=478</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-11-24 hh:11:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>General</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	XC toured again this weekend; Saturday below Great Bear Peak in upper Emery Creek (northern Flathead Range) and Sunday below Standard Peak in the Whitefish Range. The only noticable differences since last weekend is the snow depth, about 18&quot; at 6,000&#39;, and the formation of surface hoar. The XC touring is still excellent. Very thin on skiable slopes.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=476</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=476</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-11-20 hh:11:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
   <item>
         <title>General</title> 
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
	An avalanche fatality occured at Snowbird in Utah on Sunday. The resort is not yet open and therefore not controlled. This should serve as a &quot;heads up&quot; to those who head out this week to seek turns on Big Mtn or elsewhere. Similar conditions likely exist in our region. A link to the preliminary report is below. Please be careful and do not take anything for granted just because you may be in a ski area boundary.</p>
<p>
	<a href="http://utahavalanchecenter.org/accident_gad_valley_11132011">http://utahavalanchecenter.org/accident_gad_valley_11132011</a><span style="display: none">&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>
	I did some XC touring off of the Big Creek road on Saturday and Sunday. Toured up to 6,000&#39; both days and found 12&quot; to 15&quot; with about half of the snow being from the storms over the weekend. On Saturday we encountered blizzard conditions during the afternoon and evening. The snow was mostly grauple and created a slab layer on top. Observed cracking on the snow surface. Touring was excellent.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=473</link>
         <guid>http://www.glacieravalanche.org/obsdetail.cfm?recnum=473</guid>
       
		  <pubDate>2011-11-13 hh:11:ss EST</pubDate> 
   </item>
   
</channel>
</rss>

